Hypervocal Menu
 

Blog

Best Sandy Cover: ‘It’s Global Warming, Stupid’

FacebookTwitterGoogle+

HVmedia

By HVmedia
November 1, 2012 at 9:25 am



Bloomberg Businessweek: nailed it.

Here’s the lede:

Yes, yes, it’s unsophisticated to blame any given storm on climate change. Men and women in white lab coats tell us—and they’re right—that many factors contribute to each severe weather episode. Climate deniers exploit scientific complexity to avoid any discussion at all.

Clarity, however, is not beyond reach. Hurricane Sandy demands it: At least 40 U.S. deaths. Economic losses expected to climb as high as $50 billion. Eight million homes without power. Hundreds of thousands of people evacuated. More than 15,000 flights grounded. Factories, stores, and hospitals shut. Lower Manhattan dark, silent, and underwater.

An unscientific survey of the social networking literature on Sandy reveals an illuminating tweet (you read that correctly) from Jonathan Foley, director of the Institute on the Environment at the University of Minnesota. On Oct. 29, Foley thumbed thusly: “Would this kind of storm happen without climate change? Yes. Fueled by many factors. Is storm stronger because of climate change? Yes.” Eric Pooley, senior vice president of the Environmental Defense Fund (and former deputy editor of Bloomberg Businessweek), offers a baseball analogy: “We can’t say that steroids caused any one home run by Barry Bonds, but steroids sure helped him hit more and hit them farther. Now we have weather on steroids.”

That’s brave, in-your-face, and accurate.

MORE SANDY COVERAGE:
2 Must-See Sandy Time Lapses: NASA and NYTimes Webcam
Watch NYPD Helicopter Pick Up Sandy-Stranded Staten Islanders
Baby Walrus Survives Sandy Thanks to Aquarium Employees
• LaGuardia Airport Suffered Some Miiiiinor Flooding

[via @AntDeRosa]

FacebookTwitterGoogle+


GET VOCAL - COMMENT

Check out HyperVocal's Polls on LockerDome on LockerDome