Entertainment

Back to all stories

Mars Needs Moms: Historical Box-Office Bomb Leads to Hysterical Overreaction

Posted March 16, 2011 12:45pm by

There is only one adage when it comes to the business of Hollywood: that despite the best efforts of everyone involved, nobody really knows that the heck they are doing.

And yet, every time a movie becomes an unexpected hit or expected flop the entire industry attempts to wrap their brains around the underlying factors involved.

The latest example of this phenomenon is Disney’s Mars Needs Moms, a $150 million animated project helmed by Robert Zemeckis that tanked its way to a pitiable $6.9 million at the box office last weekend.

So now all the executives and pundits are scratching their heads, wondering how this could be. And they are quick to leap to conclusions not supported by the available evidence.

“Scary,” noted Chuck Viane, president of distribution for Walt Disney Studios. “Was it the idea? The execution? The timing? There are a lot of excuses being floated.” But probably a combination of all of those, plus awful marketing. It doesn’t help that the movie just didn’t look at that appealing.

You want to make a movie about a kid that travels to Mars to save his kidnapped mother? Okay sure, but first let me just tell you no. That just sounds stupid. No, a thousand times.

But instead of just looking at this as an isolated incident, of one movie gone horribly awry — as Waterworld, Cutthroat Island, The Alamo, The Adventures of Pluto Nash and Ishtar, et al. all did before it — studio executives now believe the problem is with animated movies, or motion capture pictures, or the high cost of 3-D ticket pricing.

Whatever the reasoning, Hollywood should stop being so reactionary. There’s no way one could predict the dismal failure of this movie, which has less than favorable reviews, anymore than they could have predicted the massive success of Inception or Avatar.

Instead of playing Sherlock Holmes and deducing lessons than are not applicable to future projects, studio executives should focus their energy on things they can control: marketing, the projects they finance, the cost of those movies, and not taking their audience for granted.

MOST RECENT BY HVentertainment:

Posted March 16, 2011 12:45pm






  • Paul

    If they want to drop ticket prices as a reaction to this, i wouldn’t complain. I’ve stopped going to theaters all together, because it’s just too much money.

  • http://twitter.com/wannabe_genius WG

    It seems obvious that this is garbage, but how do you explain a movie like Beverly Hills Chihuahua or Dogs and Cats 3D that rakes in money? I guess that’s what you get for playing the high-risk game of producing content that you know is worthless but hope to sell anyway. Stick to Pixar products and you’ll be fine.

    Disney just killed the Yellow Submarine because of this bomb.

  • James4368

    Congratulations on the most content-free article I’ve ever read on the web.


iGivefirst


Get Your Own Headlines That Suck Widget Here